How Europe hopes to continue to trade with Iran 2

How Europe hopes to continue to trade with Iran

European countries want to convince Iran to hold its nuclear agreement with the world's forces and hoping to create a payment system that companies import and export from Iran despite the financial and economic sanctions imposed by the US.

President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of the nuclear agreement, where Iran has agreed to limit its nuclear efforts in exchange for abolition of painful economic sanctions. In order to continue the business without the US, Europe said, Iran will find a way to operate outside the normal financial channels.

European countries call their trade mechanism INSTEX, a trade instrument.

Here's what it is and why it matters.

Q: Why does the INSTEX create?

A: Companies that banks have to import and export must pay. However, financial institutions are reluctant to encourage the American anger in Europe to set up INSTEX to show Iran want to seriously help Iran to cope with the burden of sanctions – as long as Iran is ready to keep 2015 a nuclear agreement that European countries think it is the best way to refrain, to avoid Iran's nuclear ambitions and conflicts.

Q: What exactly is INSTEX?

A: It was an organization that was supposed to coordinate, import and export payments so that European companies could deal with Iran without coming into conflicting sanctions. The United States and Iran can get so much needed goods and sales. Its founding partners are the United Kingdom, France and the United Kingdom. Others could join. It was not yet released but it soon succeeded.

Q: How would INSTEX facilitate trade?

A: It would balance the payments for import and export, the role of intermediaries and reduce the need for transactions directly between European and Iranian financial systems. Banks working with European companies are reluctant to accept funds from Iran, even for humanitarian trade, which is officially released from sanctions.

Q: How does it work in practice?

A: Let's say, for example, a European exporter wants to sell medicines to an Iranian company. INSTEX records sales in financial accounting and then finds a European importer who buys pistachios from Iran. Then INSTEX approves payment from the European pesticide importer to the European Medical Exporter. That is, the remedy is paid, but from one European bank to another, without any money from Iran.

Meanwhile, INSTEX's Iranian counterpart coordinates a similar payout from an Iranian drug importer to the Iranian pistachio exporter. The funds remain in Iran. Everyone has paid and no European bank is worried about Iranian money.

Q: Does this cover all the goods, even the oil?

A: The countries established by INSTEX said they would "focus first on the main sectors of the Iranian population – such as pharmaceuticals, medical equipment and agricultural commodities." This avoids a direct conflict with the White House because US sanctions allow trafficking in humanitarian goods. European countries that have already abandoned US oil sanctions have stopped buying crude oil, and exceptions Trumpf has now withdrawn in each case.

Cornelius Adebahr, an associate at the German Foreign Relations Council, said companies are most likely to use a payroll system, small businesses with long-term business relations in the Middle East rather than an American business. "It's a very limited audience," he said. "It's not a huge billions of dollars, especially at the beginning."

Ab-Transactions, which Europeans say, would send to Iran, "we are not only talking, but doing something, it would be important for the Europeans to do it."

Q: Can the US win the INSTEX?

European countries would actually create a diplomatic shield around companies trying to do business in Iran. This does not eliminate the risk of pressure from the US, but analysts are writing for the European Council on Foreign Relations, saying that incorporating the three largest economies in Europe increases its commitment to Washington to try to exert pressure, as it did on the private sector.

Brian Hook, United States Special Representative for Iran and Senior Advisor to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, said in May that he was skeptical that Iran would ever rely on a transparent local entity to end the arrangement. He said that if INSTEX is ever operational, the US expects to be used only for permitted humanitarian transactions: "We have said for a while that we have sanctioned every sanction … I do not see any corporate demand for INSTEX."

"We do not see any corporate craving, because when companies choose between business operations in the United States or business in Iran, it's about selecting the United States every time. So this is our current estimate of INSTEX."

Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin contributed to this report.


Updated Date: June 28 2019 01:50